Two of our professors are in the news this morning offering commentary on the latest and final presidential debate of 2008:
Dr. Erika King in the Grand Rapids Press
The economy continues to dominate voter interest, a preoccupation that has played to Obama's advantage on this issue for several weeks.
That's why political analysts deemed the debate a critical opportunity for McCain to somehow change the momentum of the race.
King didn't see it.
"I don't see it changing the essential dynamics of the race. The dreadful situation with the economy seems to be in every public opinion poll driving voters' thoughts and emotions.
"It's going to be a hard year for Republicans."
Dr. Whitt Kilbur in the Detroit News
"I thought it was a pretty good debate, but I think Senator Obama did the better job. I liked Obama's health care ideas versus Senator McCain's: McCain is going to give a $5,000 tax credit that will go straight to the insurance companies, opening up borders for health care so insurance companies can go to cheapest state and have the least amount of regulations on health care. I liked Obama's plan to spread the wealth around and give 95 percent of people a tax cut."


Assessng the Impacts of a Nuclear Iran
Erik Tucker, a former PLS minor who is currently seeking his M.Ed. at GVSU, has recently published an opinion piece entitled, "Weapons of Mass Deterrence: Assessing the Impacts of Nuclear Iran" in Fogged Clarity, which is a new arts review started by West Michigan natives.
Mark Richards in alumni, commentary, international relations | Permalink